Free Download Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Answers - Pass ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor in One Time - Perfect ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Free Practice

Rated:

, 0 Comments

Total visits: 6

Posted on: 05/20/25

P.S. Free 2025 PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by 2Pass4sure: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vRNLnkfvf2__VWCBy439PTC1f4xyYsQE

Discount is being provided to the customer for the entire PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor preparation suite. These ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor learning materials include the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor preparation software & PDF files containing sample Interconnecting PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor and answers along with the free 90 days updates and support services. We are facilitating the customers for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor preparation with the advanced preparatory tools.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam is recognized globally and is highly regarded in the industry. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is a valuable asset for individuals who want to demonstrate their expertise in information security management and auditing. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is also beneficial for organizations that want to demonstrate their commitment to information security and compliance with international standards.

>> Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Answers <<

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Free Practice, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Key Concepts

2Pass4sure cares for your queries also, there is a competition going on in market who is offering ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Material, but to remove all the ambiguities, 2Pass4sure offers you to try a free demo of actual ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam questions. The free demo will give you a clear image of what exactly 2Pass4sure offers you. You may buy the product if you are satisfied with the demo. 2Pass4sure also offers you a best feature of free updates. We update the product on a consistent basis. We own a dedicated team of experts in standby, who make the necessary changes in the material, as and when required.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam, also known as the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Exam, is a certification that validates an individual's expertise and knowledge in auditing an Information Security Management System (ISMS). PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is offered by the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), which is a global provider of training, examination, and certification services for various international standards.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q201-Q206):

NEW QUESTION # 201
Select the correct sequence for the information security risk assessment process in an ISMS.
To complete the sequence click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:
A group of black text Description automatically generated

According to ISO 27001:2022, the standard for information security management systems (ISMS), the correct sequence for the information security risk assessment process is as follows:
* Establish information security criteria
* Identify the information security risks
* Analyse the information security risks
* Evaluate the information security risks
The first step is to establish the information security criteria, which include the risk assessment methodology, the risk acceptance criteria, and the risk evaluation criteria. These criteria define how the organization will perform the risk assessment, what level of risk is acceptable, and how the risks will be compared and prioritized.
The second step is to identify the information security risks, which involve identifying the assets, threats, vulnerabilities, and existing controls that are relevant to the ISMS. The organization should also identify the potential consequences and likelihood of each risk scenario.
The third step is to analyse the information security risks, which involve estimating the level of risk for each risk scenario based on the criteria established in the first step. The organization should also consider the sources of uncertainty and the confidence level of the risk estimation.
The fourth step is to evaluate the information security risks, which involve comparing the estimated risk levels with the risk acceptance criteria and determining whether the risks are acceptable or need treatment. The organization should also prioritize the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria and the objectives of the ISMS.
References: ISO 27001:2022 Clause 6.1.2 Information security risk assessment, ISO 27001 Risk Assessment
& Risk Treatment: The Complete Guide - Advisera, ISO 27001 Risk Assessment: 7 Step Guide - IT Governance UK Blog

NEW QUESTION # 202
You are carrying out your first third-party ISMS surveillance audit as an Audit Team Leader. You are presently in the auditee's data centre with another member of your audit team.
You are currently in a large room that is subdivided into several smaller rooms, each of which has a numeric combination lock and swipe card reader on the door. You notice two external contractors using a swipe card and combination number provided by the centre's reception desk to gain access to a client's suite to carry out authorised electrical repairs.
You go to reception and ask to see the door access record for the client's suite. This indicates only one card was swiped. You ask the receptionist and they reply, "yes it's a common problem. We ask everyone to swipe their cards but with contractors especially, one tends to swipe and the rest simply 'tailgate' their way in" but we know who they are from the reception sign-in.
Based on the scenario above which one of the following actions would you now take?

A. Determine whether any additional effective arrangements are in place to verify individual access to secure areas e.g. CCTV
B. Raise an opportunity for improvement that contractors must be accompanied at all times when accessing secure facilities
C. Raise a nonconformity against control A.7.6 'working in secure areas' as security measures for working in secure areas have not been defined
D. Raise a nonconformity against control A.7.2 'physical entry' as a secure area is not adequately protected
E. Take no action. Irrespective of any recommendations, contractors will always act in this way
F. Raise an opportunity for improvement to have a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times
G. Raise a nonconformity against control A.5.20 'addressing information security in supplier relationships' as information security requirements have not been agreed upon with the supplier
H. Tell the organisation they must write to their contractors, reminding them of the need to use access cards appropriately

Answer: D

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), control A.7.2 requires an organization to implement appropriate physical entry controls to prevent unauthorized access to secure areas1. The organization should define and document the criteria for granting and revoking access rights to secure areas, and should monitor and record the use of such access rights1. Therefore, when auditing the organization's application of control A.7.2, an ISMS auditor should verify that these aspects are met in accordance with the audit criteria.
Based on the scenario above, the auditor should raise a nonconformity against control A.7.2, as the secure area is not adequately protected from unauthorized access. The auditor should provide the following evidence and justification for the nonconformity:
Evidence: The auditor observed two external contractors using a swipe card and combination number provided by the centre's reception desk to gain access to a client's suite to carry out authorized electrical repairs. The auditor checked the door access record for the client's suite and found that only one card was swiped. The auditor asked the receptionist and was told that it was a common problem that contractors tend to swipe one card and tailgate their way in, but they were known from the reception sign-in.
Justification: This evidence indicates that the organization has not implemented appropriate physical entry controls to prevent unauthorized access to secure areas, as required by control A.7.2. The organization has not defined and documented the criteria for granting and revoking access rights to secure areas, as there is no verification or authorization process for providing swipe cards and combination numbers to external contractors. The organization has not monitored and recorded the use of access rights to secure areas, as there is no mechanism to ensure that each individual swipes their card and enters their combination number before entering a secure area. The organization has relied on the reception sign-in as a means of identification, which is not sufficient or reliable for ensuring information security.
The other options are not valid actions for auditing control A.7.2, as they are not related to the control or its requirements, or they are not appropriate or effective for addressing the nonconformity. For example:
Take no action: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor ignores or accepts the nonconformity, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems.
Raise a nonconformity against control A.5.20 'addressing information security in supplier relationships' as information security requirements have not been agreed upon with the supplier: This option is not valid because it does not address the root cause of the nonconformity, which is related to physical entry controls, not supplier relationships. Control A.5.20 requires an organization to agree on information security requirements with suppliers that may access, process, store, communicate or provide IT infrastructure components for its information assets1. While this control may be relevant for ensuring information security in supplier relationships, it does not address the issue of unauthorized access to secure areas by external contractors.
Raise a nonconformity against control A.7.6 'working in secure areas' as security measures for working in secure areas have not been defined: This option is not valid because it does not address the root cause of the nonconformity, which is related to physical entry controls, not working in secure areas. Control A.7.6 requires an organization to define and apply security measures for working in secure areas1. While this control may be relevant for ensuring information security when working in secure areas, it does not address the issue of unauthorized access to secure areas by external contractors.
Determine whether any additional effective arrangements are in place to verify individual access to secure areas e.g. CCTV: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather attempts to find alternative or compensating controls that may mitigate its impact or likelihood. While additional arrangements such as CCTV may be useful for verifying individual access to secure areas, they do not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
Raise an opportunity for improvement that contractors must be accompanied at all times when accessing secure facilities: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather suggests a possible improvement action that may prevent or reduce its recurrence or severity. While accompanying contractors at all times when accessing secure facilities may be a good practice for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
Raise an opportunity for improvement to have a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather suggests a possible improvement action that may increase awareness or compliance with the existing controls. While having a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times may be a helpful reminder for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
Tell the organisation they must write to their contractors, reminding them of the need to use access cards appropriately: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather instructs the organization to take a corrective action that may not be effective or sufficient for ensuring information security. While writing to contractors, reminding them of the need to use access cards appropriately may be a communication measure for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.

NEW QUESTION # 203
Finnco, a subsidiary of a certification body, provided ISMS consultancy services to an organization. Considering this scenario, when can the certification body certify the organization?

A. At no time, since it presents a conflict of interest
B. If a minimum period of two years has passed since the last consulting activities
C. There is no time constraint in such a situation

Answer: A

Explanation:
A certification body cannot certify an organization if it has provided consultancy services to that organization. This situation presents a conflict of interest, as the certification body is required to maintain impartiality and objectivity. The ISO/IEC 17021-1 standard, which sets out requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, specifies that providing both services to the same client is incompatible.

NEW QUESTION # 204
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader guiding an auditor in training. Your team has just completed a third-party surveillance audit of a mobile telecom provider. The auditor in training asks you how you intend to prepare for the Closing meeting. Which four of the following are appropriate responses?

A. I will contact head office to ensure our invoice has been paid, If not, I will cancel the closing meeting and temporarily withhold the audit report
B. I will review and, as appropriate, approve my teams audit conclusions
C. I will instruct my audit team to wait outside the auditee's offices so we can leave as quickly as possible after the closing meeting. This saves our time and the client's time too
D. I will discuss any follow-up required with my audit team
E. It is not necessary to prepare for the closing meeting. Once you have carried out as many audits as I have you already know what needs to be discussed
F. I will advise the auditee that the purpose of the closing meeting is for the audit team to communicate our findings. It is not an opportunity for the auditee to challenge the findings
G. I will schedule a closing meeting with the auditee's representatives at which the audit conclusions will be presented
H. I will review the audit evidence and the audit findings with the rest of the team

Answer: D,F,G,H

Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.6 requires the audit team leader to conduct a closing meeting with the auditee's representatives at the end of the audit to present the audit conclusions and any findings1. The closing meeting should also provide an opportunity for the auditee to ask questions, clarify issues, acknowledge the findings, and comment on the audit process1. Therefore, when preparing for the closing meeting, an ISMS auditor should consider the following actions:
I will advise the auditee that the purpose of the closing meeting is for the audit team to communicate our findings. It is not an opportunity for the auditee to challenge these: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a systematic and consistent approach to collecting and evaluating audit evidence and reaching audit conclusions. The auditor should advise the auditee that the purpose of the closing meeting is for the audit team to communicate their findings, which are based on objective evidence and professional judgement. The auditor should also explain that it is not an opportunity for the auditee to challenge these findings, as they have already been discussed and confirmed during the audit. However, the auditor should also invite the auditee to ask questions, clarify issues, acknowledge the findings, and comment on the audit process1.
I will schedule a closing meeting with the auditee's representatives at which the audit conclusions will be presented: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a planned and agreed audit programme and schedule. The auditor should schedule a closing meeting with the auditee's representatives at which the audit conclusions will be presented, in accordance with clause
6.6 of ISO 19011:20181. The auditor should also ensure that the closing meeting is attended by those responsible for managing or implementing the ISMS, as well as any other relevant parties1.
I will discuss any follow-up required with my audit team: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a risk-based approach to determining and reporting any follow-up actions required by the auditee or the certification body. The auditor should discuss any follow-up required with their audit team, such as verifying corrective actions for nonconformities or conducting a subsequent audit1. The auditor should also document any follow-up actions in the audit report1.
I will review and, as appropriate, approve my teams audit conclusions: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a rigorous and professional process to reaching and reporting audit conclusions. The auditor should review and, as appropriate, approve their teams audit conclusions, which are based on objective evidence and professional judgement. The auditor should also ensure that their teams audit conclusions are consistent with the audit objectives and scope, and reflect the overall performance and conformity of the ISMS1.

NEW QUESTION # 205
Scenario 9: UpNet, a networking company, has been certified against ISO/IEC 27001. It provides network security, virtualization, cloud computing, network hardware, network management software, and networking technologies.
The company's recognition has increased drastically since gaining ISO/IEC 27001 certification. The certification confirmed the maturity of UpNefs operations and its compliance with a widely recognized and accepted standard.
But not everything ended after the certification. UpNet continually reviewed and enhanced its security controls and the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the ISMS by conducting internal audits. The top management was not willing to employ a full-time team of internal auditors, so they decided to outsource the internal audit function. This form of internal audits ensured independence, objectivity, and that they had an advisory role about the continual improvement of the ISMS.
Not long after the initial certification audit, the company created a new department specialized in data and storage products. They offered routers and switches optimized for data centers and software-based networking devices, such as network virtualization and network security appliances. This caused changes to the operations of the other departments already covered in the ISMS certification scope.
Therefore. UpNet initiated a risk assessment process and an internal audit. Following the internal audit result, the company confirmed the effectiveness and efficiency of the existing and new processes and controls.
The top management decided to include the new department in the certification scope since it complies with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements. UpNet announced that it is ISO/IEC 27001 certified and the certification scope encompasses the whole company.
One year after the initial certification audit, the certification body conducted another audit of UpNefs ISMS. This audit aimed to determine the UpNefs ISMS fulfillment of specified ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and ensure that the ISMS is being continually improved. The audit team confirmed that the certified ISMS continues to fulfill the requirements of the standard. Nonetheless, the new department caused a significant impact on governing the management system. Moreover, the certification body was not informed about any changes. Thus, the UpNefs certification was suspended.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Based on scenario 9, why was UpNefs certification suspended?

A. Because UpNet outsourced the internal audit function
B. Because UpNefs ISMS does not fulfill the requirements of the standard
C. Because UpNet used and applied the certification out of its scope

Answer: C

Explanation:
UpNet's certification was suspended because the certification body was not informed about the significant changes caused by the new department, impacting the governance of the management system. ISO/IEC 27001 requires organizations to inform the certification body of any changes that significantly impact the ISMS.

NEW QUESTION # 206
......

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Free Practice: https://www.2pass4sure.com/ISO-27001/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-actual-exam-braindumps.html

P.S. Free 2025 PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by 2Pass4sure: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vRNLnkfvf2__VWCBy439PTC1f4xyYsQE

Tags: Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Answers, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Free Practice, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Key Concepts, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Exam Camp, Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Quiz

Comments

There are still no comments posted ...

Rate and post your comment

Username:
Password:
Forgotten password?

Most Popular

Free Download Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Answers - Pass ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor in One Time - Perfect ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Free Practice

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Free Practice, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Key Concepts

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q201-Q206):

Login